Template talk:Chutiya dynasty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconIndia: Assam Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Assam.

Purandarnarayan[edit]

Please give another source for the Dhakuakhana grant. The current sources you have provided are not WP:HISTRS. This is especially problematic because there are a lot of 19th century - 21st century politics riding on these. It is OK to discuss these issues in Chutia kingdom in an NPOV fashion, but it is not OK to insert non-consensus stuff in a template since the template will be used in multiple articles. Chaipau (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicating kings[edit]

@Homogenie: These identifications are given by Neog (1977). Are you trying to challenge what is given in the historical literature and input your own research results? Chaipau (talk) 00:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Homogenie: read the list given in Neog (1977) page 817:
  1. Nandi
  2. Satyanarayana
  3. Lakshminarayana
  4. Durlabhnarayana
  5. Pratyashanarayana
  6. Yasamanarayana
So please do not insert your own research here and recreate a table not given in the literature.
Chaipau (talk) 01:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau: ok!

Also Sankhadhwajpal comes from the lineage of Birpal, which historians have rejected as fabricated in the 19th century. Look at the reference to N N Acharya in S Dutta's book and read up the N N Acharya's PhD Theses p225-227. This list has been rejected by Neog, D Nath, Ramesh Burhagohain, Shin and others. Chaipau (talk) 02:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]