User talk:Hazhk
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. | |
Lowercase sigmabot III
--Hazhk (talk) 19:18, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- It is not quibbling over technicalities, New Zealands uncodified constitution does not create legal provisions for the position of Prime Minster Designate no such position exists, one is either Prime Minister or Not, it is a role not succeeded to but appointed to, please refrain from adding the office back onto Chris Hipkins wikipedia page Knowledgework69 (talk) 07:25, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- I invited you to take this to the article's talk page not my personal talk page. Whether the disputed appellation "designate" is used or not, I think the infobox should note that he will (barring unforeseen circumstances or a constitutional crisis) be assuming the office of prime minister in two days. This is in accordance with New Zealand's unwritten constitution, in which the governor-general acts in accordance with the decision of the governing party. I'll let another editor revert your changes. --Hazhk (talk) 11:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
New Zealand[edit]
Howdy. I'm slightly concerned that a ever-changing mobile editor might be trying to push a republican PoV at the Governor-General of New Zealand page. Particularly concerning the status of who's head of state. New Zealand is one of the few realms, in which one of its constitutional acts directly describes the monarch as head of state. So the mobile editor pushing 'de-facto head of state' for the governor-general, is problematic. Maybe, you can come up with a better write up? if one's needed. GoodDay (talk) 04:00, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Revert[edit]
Hi Hazhk, just letting you know I reverted this edit and opened a discussion here on the topic. Please feel free to comment. Thanks! Relinus (talk) 23:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)